Introduction

As a Walden University graduate student, I'm beginning this blog as part of my course work. I've used a website for several years now for my elementary students and their parents, but I'm new to the world of blogging.

The purpose of this blog is to assist me, my fellow Walden colleagues, and others to learn more about the field of instructional design. Along the way, I'm hoping to learn more about the world of blogging!





Thursday, November 7, 2013

Creating an Inquiry-Based Unit



The principal at our elementary school hired a consultant to work with our grade levels during a school-day workshop to learn more about creating and using inquiry-based units with our students.  During the morning session the speaker delivered some background information about inquiry-based learning and showed some examples.  After a break for lunch, each grade level was charged with creating two complete units of study for social studies or science that we would then use later in the school year.  The project timeline for the teachers included preparatory work prior to the workshop, attending the workshop and creating units, and finally the implementation of the units in our classrooms.

This project was a partial success in the sense that we developed a better understanding of inquiry-based learning.  We were not able to create two complete units, but we did get a start.  The two main reasons for this lack of success were:

  • Lack of clear communication:  The literacy coach, who was the school liaison for the consultant, apparently did not explain the expectations or goals clearly to the grade levels.  The preparatory work that we completed prior to the actual meeting day to define and outline the theme for the units of study was not what the consultant was looking for and we basically had to start from scratch that afternoon.
  • Lack of buy-in:  As with any type of change, there can be resistance.  Many of the teachers were less than thrilled to attend this workshop.  Using these units meant changing teaching models in the middle of the year.  There were concerns that with minimal training, teachers would not be prepared to change from a more teacher-direct approach to a student-directed approach.


Looking back at the workshop, there were some steps that the project manager (our principal) could have taken to enable her teachers to be more successful. 

  • During the planning phase, the project manager (PM) ensures that the specific results to be achieved are clearly defined (Portny et al., 2008).  When determining the project scope and the objectives, I think that the goal of learning about inquiry-based classrooms AND creating two complete units of study was too aggressive and intimidating.  Prior to even attending the workshop, teachers were already overwhelmed regarding that goal.  After the workshop, teachers were left feeling that they did not accomplish the set task and now had the pressure of more work to complete on their own time to finish creating the units.
  • During the initial phase of the project, the PM could have made more of an effort to create buy-in for the workshop and the teaching style changes that it necessitated.  Dr. Bligh cautions about this very idea in her video podcast, Transformational Leadership, by suggesting that one challenge is to get buy-in because change often feels imposed (Laureate Education, n.d.).  The teachers at my school did feel that this project and change was imposed on them without any input.  
  • Communication is critical.  Portny et al. (2008) suggest that a common cause of project failure is poor team communications (p. 107).  Project managers should share key information with team members “in a timely fashion” (Portny et al., 2008).  More timely information from our PM and our literacy coach about the expectations, workshop agenda, preparatory work, and materials needed would have helped contribute to a more successful project experience.

We could consider this a long-term project because the initial expectations were that we would continue to use these units during subsequent school years and increasingly use an inquiry-based model rather than teacher-directed.  However, during the same year of the workshop, our principal was promoted to the district office, so we lost our PM not too long after the workshop.  In the podcast Practitioner Voices:  Barriers to Project Success, we learn about one project “headache” – when stakeholders leave or are replaced.  In this case, our PM was replaced.  What has this meant to the long-term success of these units and inquiry-based learning?  I know that my grade level has begun the shift towards more inquiry-based learning, but it has not been fully embraced.  With a new PM and lack of follow-up, the project really has fizzled.
References
Laureate Education, (n.d.). Practitioner voices: Barriers to project success. Retrieved from
Laureate Education, Inc. (n.d.). Transformational Leadership. [Video Podcast]. [With Dr. Michelle Bligh].  

Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

8 comments:

  1. Great examples from the information we received thus far in our project management class, Melissa! However, it sounds like the project was a good one that could have and should have happened. (Portney et al., 2008) You made good points in realizing that the teachers needed more support in the way of compensation for extra work expected to pull off this project. It seems like this is often the case. Just a shame the teachers can not simply say "no" when the scope of the project is getting out of control. (Laureate Education, Inc., 2010) And, all of the practitioners in the field we heard from were fairly specific about the champion needed to carry a project all the way to completion. With your principal leaving that sounds like the final blow that killed the project. All very important points, well taken. Thanks, Melissa!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Sky,

      Thanks for your comment. This model of teaching is definitely a step in the right direction. I actually used this project and idea in my research class from the summer and was able to learn a great deal more about student-directed learning. I'm incorporating as much as I can this year in my classroom. Our new administrator wants this focus to continue, but one point that I read over and over in my research was the need for ongoing staff development.

      If we consider Greer's Phase III - Follow-Up, it's as if this step was completely omitted at my school. We are given monthly allotted time to work on inquiry-based projects as a grade level, but there has been no further teacher training.

      Reference

      Greer, M. (2009). Greer's ID project management model. Michael Greer's PM Resources. Retrieved from http://michaelgreer.biz/?p=266

      Delete
    2. Hey Melissa,

      Boy does this sound familiar! I have actually been in the same scenario in an almost identical workshop. The feelings you said the teachers were expressing are similar to what the teachers in my workshop shared. We felt slightly overwhelmed with receiving training and being shown examples and then asked to produce similar plans immediately. There was also the frustration of having already planned for the year and then suddenly having to spend hours planning again.

      You spoke of the PM and his role in the planning and this had me thinking. We have learned in this course that an instructional designer often takes the role of the PM when designing. However, in my experience of professional development sessions and new implementations in schools, it seems that there is a PM who has planned a project but they do not seem to be designed very effectively and do not seem to have used an instructional design process. One of our main gripes (which you also mentioned) is the lack of teacher input in the planning phases of these projects (the learners’ analysis). I have thankfully moved now to a school where teacher input is vital in all new implementations and there is an extended timeline to these projects.
      I'm sharing an article I found, “Seven Standards for Effective Professional Development”, that states ‘PD is only as good as its implementation’ and ‘that happens by implementing teacher teams that meet up regularly’.

      Reference:
      Stansbury, M. (2012, February 18). Seven Standards for Effective Professional Development. Retrieved from: http://www.eschoolnews.com/2012/02/18/seven-standards-for-effective-professional-development/

      Delete
    3. Thanks Layla! Misery loves company! Thanks for sharing the article about effective professional development.

      Delete
  2. Melissa, do you think if there was more buy-in that the project would have succeeded? I often feel like projects that have many supporters tend to do well because many people are excited about it and want it to succeed. I think you're right about the PM's need for more buy-in. If there were more supporters, I bet your school would still be using more inquiry learning; however, education is cyclical so maybe your school has already moved on to something else. There's always a new project in school, right? ;-) Great post-mortem analysis!
    Cheers,
    Lesley

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Lesley,
      I think taking the time to create buy-in would have helped. Also, more in-depth and ongoing teacher training. The culture at our school has been for the administration to jump on the bandwagon of every new idea that comes around. I'm all for trying new things, but it seems like we've just gotten good at something and then they want us to try something new!

      Delete
  3. I think two things should have been done for your project case:

    1- Support: The school of PM had to have a support team to help the teachers, so they do not feel they are left alone with this new work.

    2- Work breakdown structure: I think if the PM had divided the work among the teachers; like dividing teachers into groups based on the class level or subject the result would have been better: the teachers would have felt the help, (each member of the same group can help others) and the load of work would have been less as it was divided among the group members

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Hiba,

      You're right - the lack of support was a real problem. We felt like we were left to try a completely new teaching approach without any ongoing support.

      Delete